<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposed R&amp;D Planning Changes: Good for Government &#8211; Bad for Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjassociates.com.au/mja-update/proposed-rd-planning-changes-good-for-government-bad-for-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjassociates.com.au/mja-update/proposed-rd-planning-changes-good-for-government-bad-for-business/</link>
	<description>R&#38;D tax credit and concesssion expert consultants - Australia&#039;s leading independent consultants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:52:44 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob McInnes</title>
		<link>http://mjassociates.com.au/mja-update/proposed-rd-planning-changes-good-for-government-bad-for-business/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob McInnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjassociates.com.au/?p=261#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Hi Kris,

Thanks for fighting the good fight!

Has anyone made the point that, if the government thinks it&#039;s become necessary to hose around as many billions of dollars as possible to stimulate the economy, the most immediately effective way to do so in a way that preserves and creates high-paying, value adding jobs (as well as adding to Australia&#039;s intellectual asset base) would be to switch Commercial Ready back on?

Cheers

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kris,</p>
<p>Thanks for fighting the good fight!</p>
<p>Has anyone made the point that, if the government thinks it&#8217;s become necessary to hose around as many billions of dollars as possible to stimulate the economy, the most immediately effective way to do so in a way that preserves and creates high-paying, value adding jobs (as well as adding to Australia&#8217;s intellectual asset base) would be to switch Commercial Ready back on?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wulff</title>
		<link>http://mjassociates.com.au/mja-update/proposed-rd-planning-changes-good-for-government-bad-for-business/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wulff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjassociates.com.au/?p=261#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Kris, John and Team

Keep making these submissions. These are issues that business would like to address if it had the time/resources or knowledge that such devlopments are taking place.

The &quot;devil is always in the detail&quot; and your team is perfectly placed to get to the bottom of each issue, and discover what it is that business stands to lose, and government needs to know.

For example, the proposed changes to R&amp;D Planning sound like they will achieve the opposite of what AusIndustry says they are intended to achieve.

Great work!
Robert Wulff
Griffith Hack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kris, John and Team</p>
<p>Keep making these submissions. These are issues that business would like to address if it had the time/resources or knowledge that such devlopments are taking place.</p>
<p>The &#8220;devil is always in the detail&#8221; and your team is perfectly placed to get to the bottom of each issue, and discover what it is that business stands to lose, and government needs to know.</p>
<p>For example, the proposed changes to R&amp;D Planning sound like they will achieve the opposite of what AusIndustry says they are intended to achieve.</p>
<p>Great work!<br />
Robert Wulff<br />
Griffith Hack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
